Seems publishers are afraid of your projects. This is #2. They can’t see the forest for the trees. It is inevitable that AI can be and probably is a collaborator for writers and journalists now. It’s a tool not a takeover.
Staying 'stubbornly human' as you suggest and adhering to humanity's core principles and values is essential. But then I think about a percentage of humans who disregard all of that in favor of their own selfish pursuits of power and greed, using AI for very nefarious purposes. Here's an example of one I read this morning from another Substack writer. https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpas-secret-60-day-pandemic-pipeline?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email I suppose then we might read the AI book as more of a cautionary tale than an autobiography.
Actually a really great idea
Seems publishers are afraid of your projects. This is #2. They can’t see the forest for the trees. It is inevitable that AI can be and probably is a collaborator for writers and journalists now. It’s a tool not a takeover.
Staying 'stubbornly human' as you suggest and adhering to humanity's core principles and values is essential. But then I think about a percentage of humans who disregard all of that in favor of their own selfish pursuits of power and greed, using AI for very nefarious purposes. Here's an example of one I read this morning from another Substack writer. https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpas-secret-60-day-pandemic-pipeline?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email I suppose then we might read the AI book as more of a cautionary tale than an autobiography.
I don't see how a human could write "how an AI describes itself"? So I don't think humans are being displaced here...am I missing something?
I mean Gertrude Stein wrote someone else's autobiography, but that is not usually how these things go...
Of course, you have trained it and so the answer is going to depend on that, too, but still, it seems like an interesting experiment.